Student Research Symposium Program Portal: Submission #55
Submission information
Submission Number: 55
Submission ID: 7791
Submission UUID: 10687788-75ad-490c-819b-13c2549c023d
Submission URI: /student-research/symposium/research-symposium-program-portal
Submission Update: /student-research/symposium/research-symposium-program-portal?token=EJ8QShTzQ7h9fVHfgtNJMQJ-ksmQatI42KWZta-OEV0
Created: Tue, 02/04/2025 - 09:02 PM
Completed: Tue, 02/04/2025 - 09:15 PM
Changed: Wed, 04/16/2025 - 11:40 AM
Remote IP address: 68.1.113.177
Submitted by: Anonymous
Language: English
Is draft: No
Webform: Research Symposium Program Portal WF
Submitted to: Student Research Symposium Program Portal
Michelle
Benjamin
{Empty}

Doctorate of Nurse Anesthesia Practice
Michelle Benjamin and Joshua Castle are aspiring Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs).
Sustaining Best Practice: Revisiting Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Assessment Methods in Anesthesia Providers
Endotracheal tube cuff pressure plays a critical role in preventing complications such as aspiration, mucosal injury, and post-operative sore throat in patients undergoing anesthesia. Maintaining an optimal cuff pressure of 20-30 cmH2O is essential to avoid adverse outcomes; however, common inflation techniques often lead to inaccurate pressure levels. This project aims to assess the impact of anesthesia provider education and the use of manometers on endotracheal tube cuff pressure management at a trauma center in the Florida Panhandle. The study compares cuff pressures before and after the distribution of manometers and educational interventions aimed at improving cuff pressure monitoring. Previous data collected at the site indicated an average cuff pressure of 54 cmH2O with 89.7% of endotracheal tube cuff pressures falling outside the recommended range. A convenience data collection method was employed to assess cuff pressures in adult surgical patients, documenting variables such as provider experience and endotracheal tube size. Results were analyzed against prior data to evaluate the effectiveness of these practice changes in achieving optimal cuff pressures. New data determined an average cuff pressure of 70 cmH2O with 87% of endotracheal tube cuff pressures falling outside of the recommended range. The findings highlight the importance of education, manometer use, and documentation in improving patient outcomes, with implications for sustained quality improvement in anesthesia practice.
Scott Stewart, DNAP, CRNA
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Nurse Anesthesia
sstewart3l@pc.fsu.edu
Dr. Gerard Hogan
Joshua Castle
Manometer, Endotracheal Tube, Cuff Pressure
https://pc.fsu.edu/student-research/symposium/symposium-program-2025/dnap
Complete
Synchronous Online Presentation
DNAP ETT CIP Project Poster.pdf359.59 KB

No
2025
5th annual Undergraduate Research Symposium, April 17, 2025
https://pc.fsu.edu/student-research/symposium/research-symposium-program-portal?element_parents=elements/student_photo&ajax_form=1&_wrapper_format=drupal_ajax&token=EJ8QShTzQ7h9fVHfgtNJMQJ-ksmQatI42KWZta-OEV0
{Empty}